<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sprint Fidelis Lead Recall &#187; law firm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/law-firm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.heart-lead-recall.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:26:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Alabama man injured by cardiac defibrillator sues manufacturer</title>
		<link>http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/news/2009/05/05/alabama-man-injured-by-cardiac-defibrillator-sues-manufacturer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/news/2009/05/05/alabama-man-injured-by-cardiac-defibrillator-sues-manufacturer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beasley Allen Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defibrillator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defibrillators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Master Consolidated Complaint for Individuals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Device Safety Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medtronic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medtronic inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P. Leigh O'Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick M. Lancaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Fidelis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Fidelis Defibrillator leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Fidelis Heart Lead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Fidelis lead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint fidelis leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted G. Meadows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuscaloosa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Beasley Allen Law Firm attorneys P. Leigh O’Dell and Ted G. Meadows filed a lawsuit on April 29, 2009, on behalf of Patrick M. Lancaster of Alabama, alleging that the plaintiff suffered injuries as a result of having been implanted with a Sprint Fidelis Lead manufactured by Medtronic, Inc. The lawsuit names defendants Medtronic [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com">Sprint Fidelis Lead Recall</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/news/2009/05/05/alabama-man-injured-by-cardiac-defibrillator-sues-manufacturer/">Alabama man injured by cardiac defibrillator sues manufacturer</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> <a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/" title="" rel="external">Beasley Allen Law Firm</a></strong> attorneys <strong><a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/attorney/leigh-odell/">P. Leigh O’Dell</a> </strong>and <a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/attorney/ted-meadows/"><strong><a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/attorney/ted-meadows/" title="Ted Meadows, Pharmaceutical Attorney" rel="external">Ted G. Meadows</a></strong></a> filed a lawsuit on April 29, 2009, on behalf of <strong>Patrick M. Lancaster</strong> of <strong>Alabama</strong>, alleging that the plaintiff suffered injuries as a result of having been implanted with a <strong><a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/sprint-fidelis/" title="" rel="external">Sprint Fidelis</a> Lead</strong> manufactured by <strong><a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" title="" rel="external">Medtronic</a>, Inc</strong>. The lawsuit names defendants <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Medtronic">Medtronic</a> Inc., <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Medtronic">Medtronic</a> Puerto Rico, Inc., and <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Medtronic">Medtronic</a> Puerto Rico Operations Co.</p>
<p>The complaint incorporates by reference the relevant portions of the <strong>Master Consolidated Complaint for Individuals</strong> on file with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in the matter In Re <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Medtronic">MEDTRONIC</a>, INC., <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/" title="" rel="external">SPRINT FIDELIS</a> LEAD PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION.<span id="more-205"></span></p>
<p>According to the complaint, Lancaster received the Sprint <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/fidelis/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Fidelis">Fidelis</a> lead on May 10, 2007 at DCH Regional Medical Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. As a result of the lead, Landcaster suffered <strong>injury and damages</strong>.</p>
<p>On October 15, 2007, <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Medtronic">Medtronic</a> suspended the sale of its <strong>Sprint <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/fidelis/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Fidelis">Fidelis</a> <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/defibrillator/" title="" rel="external">Defibrillator</a> Leads</strong> after receiving reports of fatalities associated with the defibrillators. It was discovered that the <strong>Sprint <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/fidelis/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Fidelis">Fidelis</a> leads</strong>, or cables that connected to the devices, had fractured, causing the defibrillators to <strong>unnecessarily shock patients</strong> or <strong>fail to work</strong> all together. Since the initial <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/recall/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with recall">recall</a>, <strong><a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Medtronic">Medtronic</a></strong> has increased the number of fatalities associated with the faulty leads to 13.</p>
<p>Due to a Supreme Court ruling last year, manufacturers of medical devices that have been approved by the <strong>FDA</strong> are immune to lawsuits by victims harmed by those devices. Currently, consumer and patient safety groups are working to push the <strong><a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medical-device-safety-act/" title="" rel="external">Medical Device Safety Act</a> (MDSA)</strong>, legislation that would restore the rights of patients who have been harmed by unsafe medical devices, such as Lancaster, to seek justice in state courts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/media/2009/05/04-29-2009-ba-medtronic-complaint.pdf">Read the complaint</a>.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com">Sprint Fidelis Lead Recall</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/news/2009/05/05/alabama-man-injured-by-cardiac-defibrillator-sues-manufacturer/">Alabama man injured by cardiac defibrillator sues manufacturer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/news/2009/05/05/alabama-man-injured-by-cardiac-defibrillator-sues-manufacturer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge tosses medtronic lawsuits, doesn&#8217;t disclose son&#8217;s ties</title>
		<link>http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/news/2009/02/17/judge-tosses-medtronic-lawsuits-doesnt-disclose-sons-ties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/news/2009/02/17/judge-tosses-medtronic-lawsuits-doesnt-disclose-sons-ties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Niland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defective devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defibrillator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defibrillators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food and drug administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food and drug administration fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical device manufacturer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medtronic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-emption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Fidelis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Fidelis Defibrillators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Judge Richard Kyle dismissed thousands of lawsuits against Medtronic Inc., manufacturer of the faulty Sprint Fidelis defibrillators that have allegedly injured and killed several people. Attorneys serving the patients, however, may seek to have the judge disqualified from the case because he never disclosed that his son works for the law firm representing [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com">Sprint Fidelis Lead Recall</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/news/2009/02/17/judge-tosses-medtronic-lawsuits-doesnt-disclose-sons-ties/">Judge tosses medtronic lawsuits, doesn&#8217;t disclose son&#8217;s ties</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-147" title="medtronic-logo" src="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/media/2009/02/medtronic-logo-150x91.jpg" alt="medtronic logo 150x91" width="150" height="91" />U.S. District Judge Richard Kyle dismissed thousands of lawsuits against <strong><a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" title="" rel="external">Medtronic</a></strong> Inc., manufacturer of the faulty <strong><a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/sprint-fidelis/" title="" rel="external">Sprint Fidelis</a> defibrillators</strong> that have allegedly injured and killed several people. Attorneys serving the patients, however, may seek to have the judge <strong>disqualified</strong> from the case because he never disclosed that his son works for the law firm representing <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Medtronic">Medtronic</a>.<span id="more-143"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.medtronic.com/">Medtronic</a> defended the Minnesota judge on Friday, saying that “this is clearly an effort to remove a well respected judge following rulings the plaintiffs’ lawyers do not like.”</p>
<p>Richard H. Kyle, Jr., works for a Minneapolis based law firm with offices in the Midwest, China, and Mexico. Kyle&#8217;s bio on the firm’s website states that he is “a shareholder in [the firm's] White Collar &amp; Regulatory Defense, Health Care Fraud &amp; Compliance and Litigation Groups.”</p>
<p>The website also says that Kyle “is one of the top 40 criminal defense lawyers in Minnesota by the Minnesota Journal of Law and Politics.” <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Medtronic">Medtronic</a> says that Kyle is not a part of its legal defense and has never represented the company.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Medtronic">Medtronic</a> is the world’s largest medical device manufacturer. Its <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/" title="" rel="external">Sprint Fidelis</a> defibrillators were removed from the market in 2007 because of <strong>faulty wires</strong> that <strong>shocked patients</strong> unnecessarily. The defibrillators are blamed for <strong>numerous injuries and deaths</strong>.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.startribune.com/local/39558932.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUX">Associated Press</a>, Judge Kyle is “not aware of any formal attempt to remove him from the case.” He also said that that he felt no need to disclose his son’s relationship with the law firm because his son practices criminal law and “would not work with a company like <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Medtronic">Medtronic</a>.”</p>
<p>Judge Kyle claims that he threw out the lawsuits against <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/medtronic/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Medtronic">Medtronic</a> because the company’s faulty devices had been deemed safe and effective by the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">Food and Drug Administration</a>. The doctrine of <strong>pre-emption</strong>, a legal premise that took shape during the Bush administration, allows federal laws to trump state laws. Therefore, since the federal government said that the Sprint <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/tag/fidelis/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Fidelis">Fidelis</a> defibrillators were safe, people harmed by them cannot turn to state law and thus have little or no legal recourse.</p>
<p>Which begs the question: if judges, politicians, and FDA regulators are all attached to big corporations, can the FDA’s stamp of approval on medical devices and drugs ever be trusted to protect the American people?</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com">Sprint Fidelis Lead Recall</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/news/2009/02/17/judge-tosses-medtronic-lawsuits-doesnt-disclose-sons-ties/">Judge tosses medtronic lawsuits, doesn&#8217;t disclose son&#8217;s ties</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/news/2009/02/17/judge-tosses-medtronic-lawsuits-doesnt-disclose-sons-ties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/media/2009/02/medtronic-logo-150x91.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/media/2009/02/medtronic-logo.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">medtronic-logo</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.heart-lead-recall.com/media/2009/02/medtronic-logo-150x91.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
